{"id":767,"date":"2026-07-20T11:35:35","date_gmt":"2026-07-20T11:35:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767"},"modified":"2026-07-20T11:35:35","modified_gmt":"2026-07-20T11:35:35","slug":"how-public-opinion-is-turning-against-ai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767","title":{"rendered":"How public opinion is turning against AI"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

AI was supposed to make our lives better. Instead, it\u2019s made many of us scared and angry. Communities are protesting against the building of new data centers \u2014 the warehouses of IT equipment powering the AI buildout \u2014 across the country, and increasingly they\u2019re winning. And polling shows most Americans think AI is moving too fast.<\/p>\n

Read more How success in Venezuela set Trump up for disaster in Iran<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

So how did public opinion on AI curdle so quickly? Jasmine Sun, who reports on the industry from San Francisco, argues that the backlash treats AI less as a technology and more as a political project. \u201cThe debate was not about like, is ChatGPT useful to me?\u201d Sun told me during a taping of Vox\u2019s The Gray Area. <\/em>\u201cThe debate was actually something more like, there are these big corporations and unaccountable billionaires\u2026coming into my city, coming into my life and changing it without having any sort of democratic input?\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Filling in for Sean Illing, I talked to Sun about the rise of \u201cAI populism,\u201d the parallels with the Industrial Revolution, and how the backlash could crash into the 2028 presidential election.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

As always, there\u2019s much more in the full podcast, which drops every Monday, so listen to and follow us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pandora, or wherever you find podcasts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

You\u2019ve been writing about a phenomenon you call AI populism. How would you define that? What is AI populism?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

I define AI populism as a worldview where AI is not seen as an ordinary technology, but specifically as an elite political project to be resisted. I came to the term while thinking about the AI backlash and the reasons people are increasingly anti-AI \u2014 whether that\u2019s LLM slop, whether that\u2019s Waymos in their city, whether that\u2019s a new data center project. One thing that occurred to me was that a lot of times the debate wasn\u2019t about whether ChatGPT is useful to me, or whether Waymos are safer than a human driver. The debate was actually something more like: There are these big corporations and unaccountable billionaires who are coming into my city, coming into my life, and changing it without any democratic input.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

When I talk to people who are opposing AI in various ways, they seem more concerned with this concentration-of-power, anti-elite dimension \u2014 which is where I take the word \u201cpopulism\u201d \u2014 rather than classic AI safety concerns, which are more about the technical characteristics that might introduce risk.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

You wrote a piece that touched on some of this but went to a darker place \u2014 \u201cAI populism\u2019s warning shots\u201d \u2014 and you wrote about actual shots. Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, was targeted by a Molotov cocktail and a shooting within the span of a couple of days. There was an Indiana councilman who voted for a data center and woke up to gunshots at his home and a note reading \u201cno data centers.\u201d Why do you think of those incidents of violence as warning shots of something to come?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

It was pretty scary. I\u2019m no Sam Altman fanboy, but it\u2019s terrifying that assassination attempts are showing up in response to people\u2019s worries about AI. One factor is that we\u2019ve been seeing a rising wave of political violence and support for political violence in the US, especially among young people, over the past few years \u2014 the UnitedHealthcare CEO shooting, the Charlie Kirk shooting. Increasingly, a lot of disaffected, maybe nihilistic young people are turning toward political violence as a way to express political beliefs they don\u2019t feel they have other channels for. Or maybe that person is just unwell. But I do expect to see more of it, because my theory of political discontent is that if people feel they have institutional channels to bargain for their rights \u2014 if they feel the democratic process is working, or they\u2019re part of a union and believe their union leader will go bargain about how automation shows up in the workplace \u2014 they\u2019ll most likely go through those channels.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

When it feels like the official channels aren\u2019t working, opposition becomes much more diffuse and volatile. That\u2019s part of why, in creative communities, you\u2019ll see people witch-hunting each other over AI use. I think we\u2019ll see more political violence against people seen as AI leaders, or as supporting AI leaders.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

That\u2019s really scary.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Yeah, I\u2019m quite worried about it. But again, my sense is that it comes from a feeling of \u2014 what else is there to be done, when you have this level of concentration of wealth and power, and there\u2019s no democratic input right now into how AI is regulated or built?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

It\u2019s like a jump straight from complaining at your community meeting about the data center to an act of violence.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

I was talking to some friends about this. During the 20th century in the US, there was a wave of factory mechanization and automation, but unions were really strong \u2014 often when a company said, \u201cWe\u2019re going to bring in these machines,\u201d they\u2019d sit down with the factory union leader and say, \u201cOkay, you can bring in the machines, but we\u2019re going to couple that with a wage increase,\u201d or a 35-hour workweek, or earlier retirement. There was a channel to make a deal about how automation would show up in your workplace. That meant people were more likely to accept it as something lifting all boats. I don\u2019t think that\u2019s happening now \u2014 most of the industries affected by AI aren\u2019t organized in labor unions, and the democratic channels are questionable at best.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

It\u2019s like when people have agency to be part of the transition, the process goes a lot smoother. Is there a historical analogy for a technological change that didn\u2019t allow for input from the people involved? I\u2019m thinking of the Luddites.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The Luddites are a good example. When the automated looms were introduced, there was a lot of violence against the looms. The book I\u2019d really recommend here is Carl Benedikt Frey\u2019s The Technology Trap<\/em>. He\u2019s an Oxford economist who studied a ton of historical examples \u2014 in Europe, in China, all over the world \u2014 including the Luddites and 20th-century automation. His central question was: In what contexts do workers successfully stop automation, and in what contexts do they allow it to be introduced? How does the political environment, or the balance of power between people and their leaders, change the outcome? He found that when automation was introduced alongside social welfare policies \u2014 a higher minimum wage, some form of redistribution \u2014 people were much more willing to accept it, which is fairly rational.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

I want to talk about Silicon Valley\u2019s understanding of this backlash more generally. You\u2019re painting a pretty dark picture, and you\u2019re right in the belly of the beast in San Francisco \u2014 I\u2019m sure you talk to people involved with AI every day. Is there a moment when it clicked for them that this backlash is real and something they have to take seriously? Or has that happened yet?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

I\u2019ve definitely noticed a huge difference, over the past six months, in how seriously people in Silicon Valley take the AI backlash.<\/p>\n

Read more It\u2019s no longer illegal to destroy the one thing endangered species need most to survive<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Like what?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

People just talk about it more. I\u2019d bring up AI populism to people last year, and they\u2019d normally say, \u201cIt doesn\u2019t matter \u2014 technology always introduces some discontent, people get annoyed but they get used to it, like the internet.\u201d That was the standard reaction last year. Not anymore. I think part of the reason OpenAI and Anthropic have felt pressure to introduce economic policy proposals around job automation is that they\u2019re seeing how worried people are. The data center moratoriums and the broader data center backlash have been surprising and meaningful in getting AI leaders to recognize they have both a messaging problem and an actual problem with the product and the technology they\u2019re introducing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

A lot of the increasing opposition to AI in Washington has caused people to see this too. At first, Trump \u2014 as you mentioned \u2014 was very pro-AI. He and David Sacks were accelerationists; they wanted AI to go faster and to block attempts at regulation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

He was the AI czar.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

He was<\/em> the AI czar \u2014 he\u2019s no longer the AI czar. But it turned out a lot of other constituencies, both on the left and the right, were pretty opposed. For example, Trump and David Sacks tried to introduce a big federal bill that would preempt all state-level AI regulation \u2014 no state could regulate AI for 10 years. They tried to sneak it into a big omnibus bill so no one would notice. But members of Congress realized it was happening, and \u2014 whether for kid-safety reasons or frontier-safety reasons \u2014 people said, Wait a second, the idea of preventing any state from regulating AI for ten years is crazy. <\/em>A lot of people organized in Washington to successfully stop that preemption. I think that showed the scale and bipartisanship of a coalition that was very keen to make sure it stayed possible to regulate AI was underestimated. As a result of all this \u2014 the moratoriums, the regulation fights, even the booing at graduations, the literal assassination attempts \u2014 people in Silicon Valley have become much more worried.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

China is our big competitor in the AI race, and it certainly has all the conditions for a populist pushback to AI \u2014 youth unemployment is really high, and AI technology is in some ways more advanced at taking over real-world jobs. I was watching a video about fully automated factories and a robot pharmacist. You\u2019re one of the rare American tech reporters who gets to spend time in China, and you wrote a piece that surprised me \u2014 you found there wasn\u2019t really a populist backlash to AI there. Why not?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

I was really interested in this question, and I was finishing my New York Times piece while in China for a few weeks, talking to both AI people and non-AI people. The main reason there\u2019s not a big populist backlash in China is that there isn\u2019t a lot of social unrest or populist backlash against anything \u2014 the entire MO of the Chinese government, the No. 1 priority, is domestic social stability. Any whisper of protest gets shut down; that\u2019s why they have such strong speech controls. So one factor is that China doesn\u2019t have much of a culture of resistance in general, whether in workplaces or politically. I\u2019m not saying no one dissents \u2014 but it has a cultural effect too, because people don\u2019t see it as useful or as an option. When I ask family members of mine in China about AI, sometimes they\u2019re annoyed about specific things, but fundamentally, the idea of opposing AI is seen as almost unimaginable.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The other thing about China is that if you\u2019re middle-aged there, you\u2019ve lived through so many political, economic, and technological revolutions in your lifetime. When I was a little kid visiting Shanghai in the mid-2000s, there were no high-speed trains \u2014 now China has some of the best high-speed rail systems in the world. Technology has always gone hand in hand with dramatic economic advancement, with being lifted out of poverty. The modernization process has been aggressive and disruptive, but it\u2019s not something the party has offered opportunities to resist, and it\u2019s something most Chinese people still see as an inevitability that was mostly good for most people \u2014 because incomes did increase by dramatic amounts alongside the technological change. So I think people have a similar attitude toward AI: It\u2019s much less about \u201cCan I stop the AI wave?\u201d and more \u201cHow can I take advantage of the AI wave to get ahead economically?\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

We were just talking about this deep pessimism about what technology can bring us here in the US. I think a lot of people look around and think: We don\u2019t have a cure for cancer yet, but we\u2019ve sure seen our lives get worse in a lot of ways because of technology, social media, whatever. That pessimism probably fuels the backlash to AI, the skepticism about whether it can ever deliver on its promises. And that experience just isn\u2019t the same in China, or probably much of the rest of the world, where technological progress has been faster and more concrete in people\u2019s lives.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

My 90-year-old grandfather said he\u2019d love an elder-care robot to help him do tasks around the house so he doesn\u2019t have to rely on his kids \u2014 he wants more freedom and mobility. It\u2019s seen more as a tool to help individual goals. Even with the robot factories or pharmacies \u2014 one thing that struck me visiting a robot pharmacy was that the PR people happily said, \u201cYep, we\u2019re doing these robots because human workers take too many smoke breaks and bathroom breaks and take too long.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

You\u2019d never say that in the US, but they\u2019re probably thinking the same thing \u2014 they just don\u2019t say it. The other thing they mentioned is that this lets the pharmacy operate 24\/7, because a lot of people need medications in the middle of the night and want to order via the DoorDash equivalent. There was actually a labor shortage before \u2014 Chinese workers weren\u2019t willing to work night shifts \u2014 so these pharmacies are offering real consumer surplus. A significant percentage of orders come in overnight, when no other pharmacy is open. And with the factories, part of the issue is that Chinese workers, especially young people, don\u2019t want to do factory work anymore.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

That anecdote gets at the promise and peril of AI, and the role of the backlash movement \u2014 which I\u2019m still wrestling with how I feel about. On the one hand, I want to live in a world where cancer gets cured, where we live in an era of abundance, where things are cheap and easy to make because factories can run all the time with machine workers who don\u2019t require anything \u2014 I want the future we were promised, of flying cars and everything working well. <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

But I also don\u2019t want to lose my job, or see humanity wiped out by an angry machine god. Because we don\u2019t really know what\u2019s going to happen yet, it\u2019s hard to work out my own feelings about the pushback here in the States \u2014 what\u2019s appropriate, and what\u2019s holding us back from real advances in our lives.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Totally, I agree. I like Waymos \u2014 I think they\u2019re safer, and I\u2019d prefer a safer robot car driv[ing] me around instead of me driving. I\u2019m not a good driver; no one should let me drive. So I wrestle with some of the same things.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

To close out the conversation \u2014 let\u2019s come back to the United States. AI populism is brewing as a political force. We\u2019ve seen it show up in a couple of races so far, but it\u2019s early. We\u2019ve got the midterms, then the presidential election. How do you think it\u2019s going to affect American politics this November, and in 2028?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

My sense is that this November, it\u2019s going to be more about state and local races where AI really shows up. I\u2019m going to spend some time in Michigan and Wisconsin this summer touring some of the data center sites facing the most opposition \u2014 those states also have contested governor and Senate races where AI and data centers have become a core issue, so I\u2019m interested to learn more there. I think the 2028 presidential primary and election is really where I expect AI to become a centerpiece of the conversation \u2014 especially if we start to see some of the employment impacts people are expecting. As soon as we see something like a 2 percent rise in unemployment, if that happens, I think people will be very upset, and we should expect a ton of focus on the issue.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The other thing I\u2019ll note is political opportunism \u2014 you\u2019re already seeing a bit of this, where politicians are likely to raise the salience of AI above where people might ordinarily care about it, because it\u2019s become a convenient boogeyman. It polls so poorly, people are so anti-AI and anti-data-center, AI billionaires are so unsympathetic, that no matter what your policy program is, AI is a great reason to push it. I think a lot of politicians who are being clever about this are going to move AI to the center of the conversation, raising its salience to manufacture urgency for proposals they\u2019re already excited about. That\u2019s definitely something I\u2019m watching for 2028.<\/p>\n

Read more Who counts as \u201cworking class\u201d?<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

See More:<\/span><\/p>\n
    \n
  • Artificial Intelligence<\/li>\n
  • Innovation<\/li>\n
  • Podcasts<\/li>\n
  • Political Violence<\/li>\n
  • Politics<\/li>\n
  • Technology<\/li>\n
  • The Gray Area<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Journalist Jasmine Sun examines the origins of anti-AI protests in popular skepticism of the technology as an elite project.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":766,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-767","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interesting"],"yoast_head":"\nHow public opinion is turning against AI - American Living Report<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How public opinion is turning against AI - American Living Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Journalist Jasmine Sun examines the origins of anti-AI protests in popular skepticism of the technology as an elite project.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Living Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-20T11:35:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8\"},\"headline\":\"How public opinion is turning against AI\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-20T11:35:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767\"},\"wordCount\":2860,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/2afaec3aaf858c7f49aac1503df351c5.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Interesting\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767\",\"name\":\"How public opinion is turning against AI - American Living Report\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/2afaec3aaf858c7f49aac1503df351c5.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-20T11:35:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/2afaec3aaf858c7f49aac1503df351c5.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/2afaec3aaf858c7f49aac1503df351c5.webp\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":624},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=767#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How public opinion is turning against AI\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Living Report\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How public opinion is turning against AI - American Living Report","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How public opinion is turning against AI - American Living Report","og_description":"Journalist Jasmine Sun examines the origins of anti-AI protests in popular skepticism of the technology as an elite project.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767","og_site_name":"American Living Report","article_published_time":"2026-07-20T11:35:35+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8"},"headline":"How public opinion is turning against AI","datePublished":"2026-07-20T11:35:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767"},"wordCount":2860,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/2afaec3aaf858c7f49aac1503df351c5.webp","articleSection":["Interesting"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767","url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767","name":"How public opinion is turning against AI - American Living Report","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/2afaec3aaf858c7f49aac1503df351c5.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-20T11:35:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/2afaec3aaf858c7f49aac1503df351c5.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/2afaec3aaf858c7f49aac1503df351c5.webp","width":1200,"height":624},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=767#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How public opinion is turning against AI"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/","name":"American Living Report","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanlivingreport.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=767"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/767\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=767"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}