{"id":288,"date":"2026-06-03T12:39:05","date_gmt":"2026-06-03T12:39:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288"},"modified":"2026-06-03T12:39:05","modified_gmt":"2026-06-03T12:39:05","slug":"american-cities-are-paying-too-much-for-sprawling-housing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288","title":{"rendered":"American cities are paying too much for sprawling housing"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

The housing abundance movement has won more of the intellectual argument than anyone might have predicted a decade ago. Across much of American politics, even in Zohran Mamdani\u2019s New York (listen, I love the guy), it is now at least possible to say out loud that we have too many pointless rules making it impossible to build enough housing. But that doesn\u2019t settle the politically harder questions of\u2026where exactly<\/em> should the housing go, and what should it look like?<\/p>\n

Read more AI can replicate human-made art. Here\u2019s why it can never replace it.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

There has often been disagreement among housing reformers on that point \u2014 or at least a difference in emphasis. Should advocates try to add homes in already vibrant urban and suburban areas, which would add density but run into a buzzsaw of zoning codes and angry neighbors? Or should the focus be building at the urban fringe, in the form of sprawl, where land is cheap and plentiful and obstacles to building are fewer?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

These approaches, known respectively as development, aren\u2019t necessarily opposed; with America millions of homes short, most housing experts would say that we need both. But there are many reasons to prefer building in over building out. Building on top of or in between existing development reduces the toll on the environment and wildlife, minimizes commute times, and better supports compact, walkable, livable communities. And a recent report from the Pew Charitable Trusts\u2019 housing policy initiative, the World Resources Institute, and the research firm ECOnorthwest advances another, less appreciated reason to favor infill: It could help keep your city solvent and maybe even keep your property taxes down.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

How? The researchers simulated different future housing construction scenarios across 10 diverse states, including fast-growing ones like Arizona and Texas and slower-growing states like Pennsylvania. They then compared the public costs of essential services like roads and sewer lines for homes built within existing communities versus those built at the edge of cities.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Each home developed near jobs, shops, and transit, according to the report, would require upfront infrastructure expenses about $21,000 less on average than those added at the urban fringe, amounting to a one-third reduction in the cost of that infrastructure. (The categories used in the report are more complex than just an infill-versus-greenfield split, but for simplicity, I\u2019ll use these terms as shorthand.)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The ongoing<\/em> maintenance for all that infrastructure, meanwhile, added up to about 50 percent less on average for homes built within established communities, while communities developed this way would raise about 13 percent more in property taxes per acre on average because they have more households concentrated in the same land area.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Urban analysts have made variations of this observation times , and the logic is mostly basic geometry: Compact housing development allows cities to spend less per person on physical infrastructure like roads, and to spread the costs of that infrastructure across more households. Yet American land-use policy is set up to discourage precisely that kind of growth. As a result, we build many more single-family homes than apartments or condos, and increasingly in low-density areas outside of major population centers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Meanwhile, the US is fast hitting fiscal limits \u2014 higher interest rates, an aging population, and amid it all, a nationwide revolt over property taxes. Fiscally efficient growth matters more than it has in a long time, and that might be the invitation we need to rethink America\u2019s abiding instinct to grow ever outward.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Sprawl costs cities more<\/strong>, but it\u2019s not everything<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

To understand how this works, it helps to picture it through real-world examples: Take the largely middle-class suburb of University Park, Illinois, which is home to about 681 people per square mile, and compare it to nearby Chicago, which is nearly 18 times as dense. That means University Park serves many fewer people per mile of road or foot of piping, providing a thinner tax base to pay for the infrastructure on which the community depends.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

As Pew\u2019s report notes: \u201cHome construction in established areas relies primarily on existing infrastructure and often includes apartment buildings, duplexes, townhomes, and accessory dwelling units (ADUs), all of which require less infrastructure per unit than detached single-family homes.\u201d While the report relies on modeling, its findings comport with more empirically research on the question.<\/p>\n

Read more The very casual fan\u2019s guide to the NBA Finals<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cheaper infrastructure, however, does not mean lower costs across the board. Arpit Gupta, an associate professor of finance at New York University Stern School of Business, has pointed out that physical infrastructure like roads, bridges, sewers, and water services makes up only a small share of local governments\u2019 costs in the US. Social spending, on things like healthcare and education, are much more fiscally important. That\u2019s one reason why even though the governments of blue cities like Chicago benefit from the economics of density, they are often costlier to build and live in, thanks to factors like higher public sector wages and more onerous environmental review and permitting processes.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Nevertheless, while a sprawling community may be able to shoulder the burdens of more extended infrastructure so long as it continues growing, should growth begin to stagnate, the costs of years of greenfield development can really start to hit. And in the US, one need not even venture outside the suburbs to see it. Earlier this year, I spoke with John Zeanah, the chief of development and infrastructure for Memphis, Tennessee, about what this pattern has meant for the city. \u201cMemphis lived it firsthand,\u201d he said. \u201cThere are significant costs associated with sprawl that ultimately are unsustainable.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Many sprawling American cities \u2014 Houston, Dallas, Phoenix \u2014 are growing quickly in population, but there are also many others whose populations have stagnated or declined in recent decades and that are now burdened with figuring out what to do with an overly large geographic footprint. In the late 20th century, Memphis grew by literally annexing nearby unincorporated developments, but in recent years its population has been declining.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

By 2015, compared to about 50 years prior, \u201cthe city\u2019s land area grew by over 50 percent with virtually no population growth. This meant 50 percent more infrastructure to service and maintain,\u201d Zeanah told me in an email. The costs of this go well beyond just hard physical infrastructure, Zeanah explained, extending to services like police, fire, and transit, all of which must serve a larger area than they would otherwise and need to be supported by a stagnant tax base.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Memphis is now trying to undo these mistakes. Its latest comprehensive plan, Zeanah wrote to me, recognizes that \u201cthe city\u2019s most viable path was to concentrate investment in existing neighborhoods and corridors where land and infrastructure capacity was available, relative costs are lowest, and the return on public investment is highest.\u201d In other words, exactly what Pew\u2019s research points to.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Can we overcome the barriers to density?<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The challenge is that American cities and suburbs hoping to make that philosophical change in how they grow \u2014 adding infill to already thriving neighborhoods rather than sprawling outward \u2014 face a gauntlet of regulatory and cultural barriers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

There are, of course, local zoning codes and parking minimums that bar dense home construction and have become a political albatross for cities trying to reform their approach to housing. There are NIMBYs who don\u2019t want sudden changes to their proverbial neighborhood character and wish to push any development further afield. And municipalities also have structural incentives to grow outward, because it can be easier to find money for new infrastructure than for maintaining existing infrastructure. \u201cLocal jurisdictions can access funding for upfront infrastructure costs (from federal, state, and private sources) relatively easily but face limited options for paying for long-term maintenance, making greenfield development appear fiscally attractive in the short term,\u201d Tushar Kansal, a senior officer for Pew\u2019s housing policy initiative, said in an email.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Ultimately, fiscal sustainability may be a relatively minor argument in favor of building homes as infill in established neighborhoods, albeit one with particular salience at the moment, given the American cost of living crisis and anger about taxes. But the US remains a very rich country that can afford the material costs of sprawl and exclusionary zoning if we really want it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The stronger case for infill is based not on fiscal thrift, but rather on human freedom, quality of life, and the bigger benefits to our economy of allowing population growth in our most prosperous cities. We should legalize more housing in places where people already live, because more people want to live there \u2014 and that alone should be enough.<\/p>\n

Read more How generosity became cringe<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

See More:<\/span><\/p>\n
    \n
  • Cities & Urbanism<\/li>\n
  • Future Perfect<\/li>\n
  • Housing<\/li>\n
  • Policy<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    A new report finds that homes built near existing infrastructure cost cities much less to build and maintain than homes added at the urban fringe.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":287,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-288","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interesting"],"yoast_head":"\nAmerican cities are paying too much for sprawling housing - American Living Report<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"American cities are paying too much for sprawling housing - American Living Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A new report finds that homes built near existing infrastructure cost cities much less to build and maintain than homes added at the urban fringe.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Living Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-03T12:39:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8\"},\"headline\":\"American cities are paying too much for sprawling housing\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-03T12:39:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288\"},\"wordCount\":1455,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/4389d846df740acf2e0649429c1830f1.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Interesting\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288\",\"name\":\"American cities are paying too much for sprawling housing - American Living Report\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/4389d846df740acf2e0649429c1830f1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-03T12:39:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/4389d846df740acf2e0649429c1830f1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/4389d846df740acf2e0649429c1830f1.webp\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":625},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=288#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"American cities are paying too much for sprawling housing\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Living Report\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"American cities are paying too much for sprawling housing - American Living Report","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"American cities are paying too much for sprawling housing - American Living Report","og_description":"A new report finds that homes built near existing infrastructure cost cities much less to build and maintain than homes added at the urban fringe.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288","og_site_name":"American Living Report","article_published_time":"2026-06-03T12:39:05+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8"},"headline":"American cities are paying too much for sprawling housing","datePublished":"2026-06-03T12:39:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288"},"wordCount":1455,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/4389d846df740acf2e0649429c1830f1.webp","articleSection":["Interesting"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288","url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288","name":"American cities are paying too much for sprawling housing - American Living Report","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/4389d846df740acf2e0649429c1830f1.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-03T12:39:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/4389d846df740acf2e0649429c1830f1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/4389d846df740acf2e0649429c1830f1.webp","width":1200,"height":625},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=288#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"American cities are paying too much for sprawling housing"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/","name":"American Living Report","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanlivingreport.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=288"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/287"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}