{"id":170,"date":"2026-05-23T12:06:08","date_gmt":"2026-05-23T12:06:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170"},"modified":"2026-05-23T12:06:08","modified_gmt":"2026-05-23T12:06:08","slug":"climate-changes-worst-case-scenario-is-officially-canceled","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170","title":{"rendered":"Climate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

You\u2019ve probably never heard of the term \u201cRCP 8.5\u201d \u2014 the highest-emission scenario used by climate scientists to project the planet\u2019s future. But if you\u2019ve read about climate change, you\u2019ve seen the numbers and nightmarish outcomes it produced: 4\u00b0C of warming by 2100, sometimes 5\u00b0C, sea level rising multiple feet, parts of the planet too hot for humans.<\/p>\n

Read more A death doula\u2019s advice on thinking about mortality<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Those numbers shaped a decade and a half of climate journalism, including a lot of my own when I covered climate change at Time magazine. I didn\u2019t always know \u2014 and didn\u2019t always communicate \u2014 that the scenario behind the most apocalyptic, attention-getting findings was largely an attempt to imagine how bad things could get, not a true forecast. But I wasn\u2019t alone. RCP 8.5 was a frequent background presence in climate journalism.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Last month, though, the scientists who built that scenario formally retired it. In a paper published in Geoscientific Model Development<\/em>, Detlef van Vuuren and more than 40 co-authors eliminated RCP 8.5 from the scenarios that will feed into the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change\u2019s (IPCC) Seventh Assessment Report, which is due in 2029. Based on falling clean-energy costs, climate policy, and recent emissions trends, the highest-emissions pathway had become, in their words, \u201cimplausible.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

I can understand if your eyes began glazing over as soon as you read \u201cseventh assessment report,\u201d but this shift represents real progress and hope. It means that the apocalyptic climate change future that we\u2019ve been describing for 15 years is officially no longer on the table. Instead, a merely bad<\/em> climate future \u2014 about 2.8\u00b0C by 2100 \u2014 is now the central scientific estimate. Given how hopeless our climate future has appeared at times, that really does qualify as good news.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Counting to 8.5<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Climate models can\u2019t tell you the future on their own, because how much the planet will warm depends in large part on what humans do. So scientists build scenarios: structured guesses about how the next century might unfold under different assumptions about energy use, growth, and climate policy.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Four such scenarios were introduced in 2011 as the standard set for the IPCC, the international body of scientists that periodically takes stock of global climate research and translates it into reports for governments worldwide. Three of the four were called \u201cmitigation\u201d pathways \u2014 futures where the world worked to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. One, the infamous and now obsolete RCP 8.5, was the \u201cno-policy\u201d baseline, a future with continued fossil fuel expansion, coal use roughly five times higher by 2100, and a global population pushing 12 billion. Think of it like Dickens\u2019s Ghost of Christmas Future, a vision of just how bad things could get if we did nothing to change our ways.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

And just like any dystopia, RCP 8.5 guaranteed attention. Between 2011 and 2020, more than 2,000 climate impact studies used RCP 8.5 as their default future. Almost every dramatic projection of crop failure, mass displacement, killing heat, and coastline retreat that any general reader ever encountered in climate change coverage depended on it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

All of those projections were plausible enough under the numbers set by RCP 8.5, but by the mid-2010s, researchers, journalists, and even official government reports were routinely calling the scenario \u201cbusiness as usual,\u201d a phrase that transformed a stress test into something that sounded like a forecast. It wasn\u2019t, and it was never meant to be. Somewhere along the way, though, that distinction got lost.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

How the worst case got walked back<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The world that RCP 8.5 assumed will never arrive. Global coal use isn\u2019t on a path to quintuple; consumption has largely plateaued after decades of growth. Instead of the global population ballooning to 12 billion people, the UN\u2019s current median forecast projects about 10.2 billion by 2100, with other reputable forecasts putting the number even lower. (All things being equal, fewer people means less emissions.)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

At the same time, the clean energy transition moved faster than almost anyone in 2011 anticipated. The cost of solar power has fallen by about 85 percent since the RCPs were published, and annual global investment in the energy transition is now over $2 trillion. Actual global emissions have tracked far more closely to what you\u2019d expect from a world trying to reduce them than from one doing nothing at all. By 2026, Climate Action Tracker estimated that current policies put the world on course for about 2.6 degrees of warming by 2100 \u2014 still serious, but a long way from 4 or 5.<\/p>\n

Read more What we see when we look into the eyes of a bird<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Was RCP 8.5 ever realistic? One camp of experts, led by climate scientist Zeke Hausfather and energy modeler Glen Peters, argues that RCP 8.5 was plausible in 2011, but was taken off the table by genuine policy and technology progress. The other camp, led by Roger Pielke Jr., argues that the rate of global decarbonization has been roughly linear for decades. That would mean we didn\u2019t actively avoid RCP 8.5; it was just never realistic to begin with. Both camps agree on what counts, though: RCP 8.5 should be gone, and the planet is still on track to warm between 2.5\u00b0 and 3\u00b0 by 2100.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

RCP 8.5 was as much a climate journalism story as it was a climate science one. In 2017, the writer David Wallace-Wells published \u201cThe Uninhabitable Earth\u201d in New York magazine. It was probably the most widely read piece of climate journalism of the last decade, and it was built almost entirely on RCP 8.5 projections.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Wallace-Wells revised his view in 2022, though there has been relatively little coverage of this year\u2019s retirement of RCP 8.5. And researchers need to catch up: Pielke Jr. estimated that as late as early 2026, 30 new RCP 8.5 studies were coming out each day on average, generating more grist for the climate ultra-doom narrative. We\u2019ll see whether last month\u2019s announcement finally puts it to rest.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

The future is in our hands <\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

But even if we\u2019ve averted doom, there is a lot of work to do to secure a safer future.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The new \u201cmedium\u201d climate pathway \u2014 the one that reflects current policies \u2014 estimates 2.8\u00b0C of warming on average by 2100, with the likely range running from 2.1\u00b0C to 3.7\u00b0C. That would still mean drastic declines in coral reefs and accelerated species extinction, worsening water scarcity, and further sea level rise. And while we\u2019ve taken the worst of the worst-case scenarios off the table, we\u2019ve run out of time to keep warming below 1.5\u00b0C, and 2\u00b0C \u2014 the upper limit that the 2015 Paris Accords sought to prevent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

And as with anything to do with climate change, this scientific shift was quickly politicized. The day before Hausfather and his co-authors published their analysis of RCP 8.5\u2019s retirement, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social: \u201cGOOD RIDDANCE!\u201d, and described the change as proof that climate science was \u201cWRONG! WRONG! WRONG!.\u201d Not surprisingly, Trump is the one who is wrong here, as Carbon Brief explained in detail, but his mistake shows how easy it is to take the wrong lesson from the end of RCP 8.5. We shouldn\u2019t fall for it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The entire point of climate scenarios like RCP 8.5 was that there was no one certain future for climate change \u2014 only multiple possible futures. Whether or not RCP 8.5 was ever possible, the enormous advances in clean energy over the past 15 years are what made its retirement certain. Now we have new futures before us, waiting for what we do next.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

A version of this story originally appeared in the Good News newsletter. Sign up here!<\/em><\/p>\n

Read more How the Oklahoma City Thunder became the NBA\u2019s villains<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Climate scientists just retired the worst-case scenario that drove 15 years of \u201cuninhabitable Earth\u201d coverage. The future left is still difficult.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":169,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-future-perfect"],"yoast_head":"\nClimate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled - American Living Report<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Climate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled - American Living Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Climate scientists just retired the worst-case scenario that drove 15 years of \u201cuninhabitable Earth\u201d coverage. The future left is still difficult.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Living Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-23T12:06:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8\"},\"headline\":\"Climate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-23T12:06:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170\"},\"wordCount\":1258,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/25e687b2de645e9155f9e68510d0727a.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Future Perfect\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170\",\"name\":\"Climate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled - American Living Report\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/25e687b2de645e9155f9e68510d0727a.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-23T12:06:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/25e687b2de645e9155f9e68510d0727a.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/25e687b2de645e9155f9e68510d0727a.webp\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":623},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?p=170#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Climate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Living Report\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanlivingreport.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Climate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled - American Living Report","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Climate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled - American Living Report","og_description":"Climate scientists just retired the worst-case scenario that drove 15 years of \u201cuninhabitable Earth\u201d coverage. The future left is still difficult.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170","og_site_name":"American Living Report","article_published_time":"2026-05-23T12:06:08+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8"},"headline":"Climate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled","datePublished":"2026-05-23T12:06:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170"},"wordCount":1258,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/25e687b2de645e9155f9e68510d0727a.webp","articleSection":["Future Perfect"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170","url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170","name":"Climate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled - American Living Report","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/25e687b2de645e9155f9e68510d0727a.webp","datePublished":"2026-05-23T12:06:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/25e687b2de645e9155f9e68510d0727a.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/25e687b2de645e9155f9e68510d0727a.webp","width":1200,"height":623},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?p=170#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Climate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/","name":"American Living Report","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7b970e3bc484fe2e26860a4380d70de8","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanlivingreport.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=170"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/169"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanlivingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}